Online Gaming

The growth of the internet has undoubtedly led many people to focus more of their time on computers. One of these internet time consumers is online games. In fact, according to this article, "Tens of millions of players are active worldwide, with new players joining every month." For a church that operates on the voluntary contributions of time and resources from its members, this can be bad news. The article sites three examples of people who have allowed the gaming world to become more important than the 'real' world. However, taking a step back, its hard for me to agree that this is in general a bad thing. As the article does point out, "They [online games] fill social needs that may be unmet in the real world. For instance, a teenage boy may not feel popular or successful at high school, but in the online world, he gets a fresh start and a new set of friends. His problem-solving skills and intelligence make him socially important in his virtual community." Is this so bad? For the record, I have never played in an online game world. My belief, however, is that we should pursue what makes us happy, and the person that knows best of what makes them happy is him/herself. So, if you enjoy online gaming, I say go for it.

Revolution OS

What stood out to me in the Revolution OS video was the significance of open source software. Open source software is software that anyone can contribute to. It is free to use. In order to use open source software, you must agree to not sell it. In some ways, it is mind-boggling that people have the motivation to contribute to projects that will provide monetary benefit. It just goes to show that engineers take a personal interest in their projects. Through the internet, open source software is possible. Programmers have the ability to collaborate on projects, giving of their own time and talents freely. This seems like it would be a sure case of chaos without much productivity. However, open source software projects have proven to be very successful. Revolution OS talks about the GNU project and Linux which are results of open source projects.

What role should gender play?

Anyone with a remote sense of the world around them knows that gender equality is a hot topic. In politics, republicans are often ridiculed for not showing equality towards women. The mormon church is often in the news as a result of women requesting to get the priesthood. The majority of society has long held that men and women should do certain things and be a certain way as a result of their gender. In short, gender equality affects almost every aspect of society. So what role should gender play? My personal view is that gender should not play any role in who we are or what we decide to do. While I tend to fit in more of a masculine mold of men, I have complete respect for men that choose to be or do otherwise and same for women and their perceived roles. It is nice to see that Cecil O. Samuelson shared these views (at least to some extent) when he said that the idea of women studying math and science does not conflict with church doctrine.

Patent Trolls

Growing up I have always wondered what the purpose of patents was. I heard at least a couple horror stories where someone basically stole the credit for an invention because they had the patent first but in reality someone else had come up with the idea first. After reading an article by Daniel McCurdy titled Patient Trolls Erode the Foundation of the US patent System, I have a better understanding of the purpose of patents. They help protect ideas so that those who come up with them are encouraged to pursue them. As people come up with new ideas, the economy is stimulated and grows. However, patent trolls are a real problem. Patent trolls buy peoples patents and make money enforcing those patents. They don't produce anything. This hurts innovation because it does the opposite of what patents are designed for. The problem is worsening as the article points out that the number of patent lawsuits is on the rise. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. My guess is that new laws will be put place or current laws will be reworded to fight off this practice.

A double-edged sword for the church

Without a doubt, the advancement of technology, especially the internet, has been a double-edged sword for the church. On one side, technology has been a significant aid to the church. The internet has made it possible for many people to learn about the church as a member or non-member. Software programs have greatly simplified the task of managing wards and stakes. In addition, software cuts down on the amount of paper-work. This increases data organization and security as well as cuts costs. However, the internet has also been harmful for the church. While many things on the internet are not credible, there are many aspects of the church's history that are true and disturbing to most members. This information has been made more available through the internet. In this way the internet forces transparency, and it is my opinion that the internet has done more harm than good to the church, for better or worse.